Skip to content
ClaraDB
Sign inOpen ClaraDBCheck a productStart a workspace

CAS 220158-86-1

Is 1-(3-((4-Aminophenyl)amino)propyl)-3-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium chloride hydrochloride banned where you sell?

Also listed as Methylimidazoliumpropyl p-phenylenediamine HCl. 2 markets have rules for it. Selling something that contains it? Check it free, no account needed.

Check a productStart a workspace
  • Free
  • No account needed
  • The law behind every rule

Status

Status by market

Banned, limited, needs a warning, or no rule we know of. US states also follow federal rules, shown in their own row.

Market
Status
Requirement, dates and source
United States (federal)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

California (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

Colorado (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

Connecticut (US state)
Not covered

We hold no rules for this market.

Hawaii (US state)
Not covered

We hold no rules for this market.

Illinois (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

Maryland (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

Maine (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

Minnesota (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

New Hampshire (US state)
Not covered

We hold no rules for this market.

New Jersey (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

New Mexico (US state)
Not covered

We hold no rules for this market.

New York (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

Oregon (US state)
Not covered

We hold no rules for this market.

Rhode Island (US state)
Not covered

We hold no rules for this market.

Vermont (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

Washington (US state)
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

European Union
Limited

For Oxidative hair dye: Limit 2 % (content basis). In force since 3 Jun 2021.

“As from 3 June 2021, after mixing under oxidative conditions the maximum concentration applied to hair must not exceed 2 % (calculated as free base)”
Annex III entry 316 · fetched 2026-10-09European Commission / Publications Office (CELLAR): Reg. (EC) 1223/2009 Annexes II-VI(opens in a new tab)
Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales)
Limited

For Oxidative hair dye: Limit 2 % (content basis). In force since 3 Jun 2021.

“As from 3 June 2021, after mixing under oxidative conditions the maximum concentration applied to hair must not exceed 2 % (calculated as free base)”
Annex III entry 316 · fetched 2026-10-10The National Archives (legislation.gov.uk): Reg. (EC) 1223/2009 (retained) Annexes II-VI(opens in a new tab)
Japan
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 12 Jul 2024, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

South Korea
No known rule

We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 8 Oct 2026, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • United States (federal)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • California (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • Colorado (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • Connecticut (US state)
    Status
    Not covered
    Requirement, dates and source

    We hold no rules for this market.

  • Hawaii (US state)
    Status
    Not covered
    Requirement, dates and source

    We hold no rules for this market.

  • Illinois (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • Maryland (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • Maine (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • Minnesota (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • New Hampshire (US state)
    Status
    Not covered
    Requirement, dates and source

    We hold no rules for this market.

  • New Jersey (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • New Mexico (US state)
    Status
    Not covered
    Requirement, dates and source

    We hold no rules for this market.

  • New York (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • Oregon (US state)
    Status
    Not covered
    Requirement, dates and source

    We hold no rules for this market.

  • Rhode Island (US state)
    Status
    Not covered
    Requirement, dates and source

    We hold no rules for this market.

  • Vermont (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • Washington (US state)
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 1 Jan 2025, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • European Union
    Status
    Limited
    Requirement, dates and source

    For Oxidative hair dye: Limit 2 % (content basis). In force since 3 Jun 2021.

    “As from 3 June 2021, after mixing under oxidative conditions the maximum concentration applied to hair must not exceed 2 % (calculated as free base)”
    Annex III entry 316 · fetched 2026-10-09European Commission / Publications Office (CELLAR): Reg. (EC) 1223/2009 Annexes II-VI(opens in a new tab)
  • Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales)
    Status
    Limited
    Requirement, dates and source

    For Oxidative hair dye: Limit 2 % (content basis). In force since 3 Jun 2021.

    “As from 3 June 2021, after mixing under oxidative conditions the maximum concentration applied to hair must not exceed 2 % (calculated as free base)”
    Annex III entry 316 · fetched 2026-10-10The National Archives (legislation.gov.uk): Reg. (EC) 1223/2009 (retained) Annexes II-VI(opens in a new tab)
  • Japan
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 12 Jul 2024, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

  • South Korea
    Status
    No known rule
    Requirement, dates and source

    We have no rule for it here. Our coverage starts 8 Oct 2026, and this doesn't mean it's allowed.

California

Prop 65 listing

California's list of chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm.

Not on the Prop 65 list in our data

Not on California's list when we last checked it.

See California coverage

Groups

Group memberships

Groups that name this substance. Markets define groups like PFAS in different ways.

Not named in any group

No group we track names this substance. Groups like PFAS are defined by chemical structure and don't list members, so whether it's in one depends on your product.

See how PFAS is defined

Records

Recalls and alerts

Recalls, safety alerts and Prop 65 notices that name 1-(3-((4-Aminophenyl)amino)propyl)-3-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium chloride hydrochloride, with a link to the original. A Prop 65 notice is a claim by the sender, not a ruling.

No records in our feeds

No Prop 65 notice, EU Safety Gate alert or CPSC recall has named 1-(3-((4-Aminophenyl)amino)propyl)-3-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium chloride hydrochloride since January 2023. Other agencies may still have acted.

See all recalls and alerts

See also

Related

Alerts

Get an email when these rules change.

Check a product free, no account needed. Save it, and you see when a rule that affects it changes, and Team emails you the day it does.

Check a productStart a workspace

Free for 10 products. Email alerts from $39 a month. See pricing